ERROR: relation "aaa191801_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa191801_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa191801_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa191801_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Accounting Behavior and Organizations Section Meeting: The Impact of Juror Knowledge of Deductibility and Defendants’ Tax Rates on Punitive Damages Awards: Experimental Evidence
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

The Impact of Juror Knowledge of Deductibility and Defendants’ Tax Rates on Punitive Damages Awards: Experimental Evidence

Sat, October 5, 3:30 to 5:00pm, TBA

Abstract

The US Tax Code allows defendants to treat punitive damages as a deductible expense. Legal scholars posit that jurors are unaware that punitive damages are tax-deductible. Consequently, they claim that defendants are penalized for lower amounts than they would be if jurors were instructed about tax-deductibility. We conduct an experiment to test this claim. We provide jurors with information about tax-deductibility and the defendant’s effective tax rate (ETR) to provide them some context to adjust their awards. We find that jurors who are explicitly instructed that punitive damages are tax-deductible award higher damages when the defendant’s ETR is low, but not when the defendant’s ETR is high. This result is surprising because defendants with a higher ETR are likely to benefit more from tax-deductibility compared to defendants with a lower ETR. Our results inform the debate on providing jurors with information about defendants’ tax situation.

Authors