ERROR: relation "aaa160301_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa160301_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa160301_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa160301_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Auditing Section Midyear Meeting: Do Big 4 Audit Firms Around the World Approach Monopoly Pricing when Audit Market Concentration is High?
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Do Big 4 Audit Firms Around the World Approach Monopoly Pricing when Audit Market Concentration is High?

Sat, January 16, 10:15 to 11:45am, TBA

Abstract

We examine whether the concentration with the group of Big 4 audit firms within countries around the world is associated with audit fees. Regulators have been concerned with the effects of Big 4 dominance and concentration on both audit quality and audit fees. We provide evidence that when concentration within the Big 4 group of firms within a country is higher, they are able to charge outsized rents that possibly approach monopoly pricing. Further, we find this effect only for auditors that possess expertise (both industry-related and IFRS-related). Finally, we find this effect only in markets where the overall level of competition is lower, suggesting that other competitive pressures are able to mitigate the effects of Big 4 concentration on audit pricing. This also indicates that in less-competitive environments overall, the audit pricing effects of Big 4 concentration are especially harmful for audit pricing.

Authors