Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Using proprietary information about Chinese audit firms’ Professional Risk Fund (PRF) and Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII), and audit adjustments data for publicly traded clients, we examine whether and how audit firms’ PRF and PII relate to audit adjustments. Using the probability and magnitude of making audit adjustments to clients’ profits, we find that audit firms’ PRF and PII have opposite effects on audit adjustments. In particular, audit firms with larger PRF provisions exhibit higher audit adjustments, whereas audit firms that hold more PII exhibit lower audit adjustments. Our findings are robust to multiple approaches for addressing potential endogeneity, including using a changes model, a fixed-effects model, and a difference-in-differences specification. The results call into question the use of one-size-fits-all regulations regarding specific risk-shielding methods.
Yingwen Deng, Renmin University of China
Gerald Lobo, University of Houston
Cyndia Wang, The University of British Columbia
Min Zhang, Renmin University of China
Jie Xue, Ministry of Finance of China