Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
We document significant heterogeneity across countries in the ability to assess a firm’s likelihood of default using market- and accounting-based sources of default risk information. Surprisingly, for some countries, we find that a default prediction model based solely on public financial reporting information outperforms a model based solely on market variables. Our evidence suggests that variation in the predictive ability of market-based variables across countries is primarily attributable to the existence of capital market frictions, such as short sale constraints, which prevent the incorporation of information into prices, rather than the availability of information. Finally, we document that direct incorporation of accounting information into the default prediction model largely offsets the loss in overall predictive accuracy created by market frictions, especially in countries with high corporate transparency.
Mark Maffett, The University of Chicago
Edward Owens, University of Rochester
Anand Srinivasan, National University of Singapore