ERROR: relation "aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Midyear Meeting of the Financial Accounting and Reporting Section: Understanding the "Numbers Game"
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Understanding the "Numbers Game"

Sat, January 27, 10:00 to 11:30am, TBA

Abstract

We model the earnings management decision as the manager’s tradeoff between the costs and capital market benefits of meeting earnings benchmarks. Using a regression discontinuity design, we estimate these benefits and the realized earnings distribution as model inputs. Estimated model parameters yield the percentage of manipulating firms, magnitude of manipulation, noise in manipulation, and sufficient statistics to evaluate proxies for “suspect” firms. Finally, we use SOX as a policy experiment and find that, by increasing costs, it reduced earnings management by 36%. This occurred despite an increase in benefits, as the market rationally became less skeptical of firms just-meeting benchmarks.

Authors