ERROR: relation "aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa180201_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Midyear Meeting of the Financial Accounting and Reporting Section: When Does the SEC Exercise Enforcement Leniency?
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

When Does the SEC Exercise Enforcement Leniency?

Sat, January 27, 10:00 to 11:30am, TBA

Abstract

This paper documents a regime shift in the SEC enforcement on financial misconduct. We find that while the SEC imposes a higher sanction before 2010 on misconduct firms who cooperate with SEC investigation, it now rewards cooperative violators with more lenient treatment in reduced charges and penalties. We show this regime shift is primarily due to the SEC exercising more leniency towards good faith cooperation (e.g., timely disclosure, replacing executives), as opposed to perfunctory cooperation (e.g., independent investigations). Additionally, we find that misconduct firms have become reluctant to cooperate under the new regime. Our findings highlight the importance of regulators establishing a clear incentive structure and limiting prosecutorial discretion when operationalizing an effective leniency program.

Authors