ERROR: relation "aaa140501_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa140501_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa140501_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa140501_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.International Accounting Section Midyear Coinference: Private Litigation Risk and the Information Environment: Evidence from Cross-Listed Firms
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Private Litigation Risk and the Information Environment: Evidence from Cross-Listed Firms

Fri, February 21, 10:30am to 12:00pm, The Westin Riverwalk, TBA

Abstract

We use a natural experiment, the Supreme Court Ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank and the subsequent Dodd-Frank Act, to isolate and examine whether and how expected private litigation costs affect voluntary disclosure behavior. The Morrison decision applied a presumption against extraterritoriality for all securities actions. Congress quickly responded by exempting SEC actions through the Dodd-Frank Act, with the result that Morrison eliminates only private securities actions for shares purchased on non-US exchanges. These events lowered the expected private litigation costs for foreign firms cross-listed on US exchanges. We find a deterioration in voluntary disclosure for these firms relative to a matched sample of US firms. This effect is stronger for firms with weaker home country institutions. The evidence is consistent with firms responding to a reduction in expected private litigation costs by reducing public information.

Authors