ERROR: relation "aaa171401_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa171401_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa171401_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa171401_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.Mid-Atlantic Region Meeting: The Influence of CEO Power and Public Outrage on I.R.C. Section 162(m) Compliance
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

The Influence of CEO Power and Public Outrage on I.R.C. Section 162(m) Compliance

Fri, May 5, 3:55 to 5:35pm, Hyatt Regency Crystal City, TBA

Abstract

Congress enacted Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) to influence CEO compensation design. Section 162(m) ostensibly limited the tax deductions associated with executive compensation, allowing firms to deduct additional amounts if those payments met certain requirements. However, many firms elect to pay CEOs compensation that does not qualify for a tax deduction under §162(m). Our research question is twofold. Do powerful CEOs influence firm noncompliance with §162(m)? If so, does public outrage mitigate this influence? We provide evidence consistent with both of our hypotheses, i.e., non-tax deductible compensation, primarily salary in excess of $1 million, increases with proxies for CEO power and that public outrage weakens this relation.

Authors