Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Search Tips
Conference
Virtual Exhibit Hall
Personal Schedule
Sign In
One of the issues that can potentially affect the internal validity of interactive online experiments is collusion: participants could act upon information shared through channels that are external to the experimental design. Using an experiment that provides strong incentives for participants to collude, I measure how prevalent collusion is among MTurk workers and whether collusion depends on experimental design choices. In the treatments that resembled the design of most other interactive online experiments, I find no evidence that MTurk workers collude. This suggests collusion is not a concern for data quality in the vast majority of interactive online experiments. However, in the treatment in which participants were explicitly told that communication with others is allowed, I find evidence of collusion. This suggests that collusion is possible and that it should not be ignored as a potential threat to data quality in experiments in which participants have strong incentives to collude.