ERROR: relation "aaa191001_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa191001_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.ERROR: relation "aaa191001_proceeding_action_tracker" does not exist LINE 1: INSERT INTO aaa191001_proceeding_action_tracker(action_track... ^There was an unexpected database error.AAA Ohio Region Meeting: Regulatory Enforcement and Off-Balance Sheet Entities: Evidence from the “Shadow Insurance” Market
Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Download

Regulatory Enforcement and Off-Balance Sheet Entities: Evidence from the “Shadow Insurance” Market

Fri, May 10, 6:00 to 7:30pm, Columbus Marriott Northwest, TBA

Abstract

This paper studies the relation between regulatory enforcement and an insurance firm’s use of off-balance sheet captive insurance entities, as well as the implications of regulatory enforcement and captive reinsurance use for the firm’s credit ratings and the degree of information asymmetry in the market for the firm’s equity. Captive reinsurance (“shadow insurance”) is a controversial form of non-traditional reinsurance that is associated with opaque statutory reporting in the insurance industry. Captive reinsurance subsidiaries are special purposes entities that are not consolidated under the statutory accounting principles (SAP) and can be used to manage a firm’s statutory reserve liabilities and premiums, which are reported net of reinsurance. I find that regulatory enforcement is negatively associated with the use of captive reinsurance among life insurers. Among life insurers, I find some evidence that credit rating agencies infer information about a firm’s default risk from its regulatory enforcement environment in the high regulatory scrutiny time period, and that regulatory enforcement can reduce information asymmetry in the market. Contrary to what I hypothesize, the use of “shadow insurance” is negatively associated with proxies for information asymmetry in equity markets among pure property-casualty insurers. Overall, my findings suggest that regulated firms, credit rating agencies, and equity investors act as if regulatory enforcement increases the credibility of accounting reports and reduces information asymmetry in the market. Also, sub-sample analyses indicate that public awareness of accounting issues may be important for regulatory enforcement and its credibility. Nevertheless, regulatory attention to one set of firms can have a spill-over effect on the peers in the same industry that receive less regulatory attention. These findings should be of interest to regulators, investors, preparers, and other stakeholders impacted by accounting standards and their enforcement.

Author