Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Area of Study
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Discipline
Search Tips
AAS 2016 Print Program
Personal Schedule
Sign In
According to modernist accounts, nationalism and nation-building are a modern phenomenon that is mostly the result of modern state formation and/or emerging market capitalism. In these common accounts, the role of religion (or lack thereof) is largely neglected. As acknowledged by recent studies, Southeast Asian states and their post-independent nation-building experiences challenge such modernist accounts of nationalism both empirically and theoretically. In Thailand and Malaysia, for example, a majority religion formed the core foundation of official nationalism and counter forces, forcing challengers to struggle against these dominant visions of nation in order to advance an alternative national model. Moreover, more recent upsurges of violence against religious minorities in Burma and Indonesia raise questions about the success of secular nationalism in deeply divided societies. This paper comparatively examines various forms of nationalism in Southeast Asia to gain a better understanding of the role of religion in the process of official nation-building and the consequences of the process on the problem of religious freedom and communal rights. In particular, it looks into two sets of comparable cases, Muslim-majority Indonesia and Malaysia and Buddhist-majority Burma and Thailand, in order to answer why and how religious and secular nationalism gain prominence in official nation-building in some places but not others. In contrast to conventional accounts, my historical comparative analysis of those Southeast Asian nations will be focused on regime formation, with a particular interest in political and religious elites’ efforts to consolidate power and authority within their respective majority community.