Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Area of Study
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Discipline
Search Tips
AAS 2017 Print Program (coming soon)
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Research from outside of Asia suggests that electoral mobilization increases the salience of ethnicity. Does this hold for the diversecountries of Malaysia and Singapore as well? While ethnicity continues tostructure many aspects of life in both countries, they diverge in one important way: the government of Malaysia leverages ethnicity forpolitical mobilization, while the government of Singapore has made efforts to depoliticize it. This provides a unique opportunity to understand how different forms of political mobilization affect the relationship between elections and ethnic salience. This paper examines changes to ethnic tensions prior to general elections in Malaysia and Singapore between 2004 and the present by using data from Google Trends. Specifically, I compare variation in the prevalence of racially-charged Google searches―which I argue closely reflect wider changes in ethnic tensions―as elections approach. My initial work on this suggests that Malaysia’s elections see a strong increase in ethnic tension, while those in Singapore do not heighten tensions. This provides insights not only into ethnic relations in these two countries, but also adds an important refinement to the
general theory.