The Great Debate (v)

Full Session: Innovate! Session

Short Description

Are we too collegial for the sake of avoiding confrontations? Well-intentioned practices, such as using hedging language or respectfully disagreeing without further engagement, can result in avoiding deeper discussions about often meaningful or significant implications. Such vail pleasantries do little to advance the field or our own thinking. In this structured debate, leading scholars tackle position statements about the field. We aim to engage panelists and audience members as agents of change, disruptors, with the potential to ignite broader dialogues.

Team Joi
Joi Moore, Patricia Young, Stephanie Moore

Team Enilda
Enilda Romero-Hall, Lucas Vasconcelos, Spencer Greenhalgh, Daniela Castellanos Reys

Team GSA
Pauline Maljana, Kae Novak, Anne Fensie, Dana ALZoubi, Annetta Dolowitz, Chris Luchs

Sub Unit

• AECT

Chair

• Tutaleni I. Asino, Oklahoma State University

Presenters

• Joi Moore, University of Missouri

• Patricia Young, Uni. of Maryland Baltimore County

• Stephanie L. Moore, University of New Mexico

• Enilda Romero-Hall, The University of Tampa

• Lucas Vasconcelos, University of South Carolina

• Spencer P. Greenhalgh, University of Kentucky

• Daniela Castellanos Reyes, Purdue University

Zoom Meeting Alternate Host

• Mauricio Cadavid, California State University

Zoom Meeting Host

• AECT Zoom Host 25, AECT