Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Although there seems to exist a consensus regarding what constitutes the elements of “good teaching”, qualities such as curriculum in the content areas have been traditionally safeguarded by academic freedom. Issues related to grading, program acceptance, program continuation and recommendation for licensure were matters for institutional determination not judicial intervention. Recently, however, courts have suggested a change in judicial oversight of these decisions that will force teacher preparation programs to reexamine they ways and means that “intangible” expectations of candidates can be measured in a legally defensible fashion. This individual paper discussion seeks to provide a forum to describe, examine and discuss various means by which pre-service teacher candidate’s dispositions can be measured and evaluated in a legally defensible fashion.
Thomas J. Sheeran, Niagara University
Vince Joseph Rinaldo, Niagara University
Walter S. Polka, Niagara University
Robert Michael Smith, Niagara University