Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Submission Type
Browse By Descriptors
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Despite an increased emphasis on formal training and monitoring of doctoral advisers, there is a striking silence about what advisers learn from advising and how this learning ought be theorized. This paper begins to address this gap by drawing on a thematic analysis of interviews with cross-disciplinary sample of experienced advisers. The analysis shows that doctoral advising impacts on advisers’ learning and knowledge but not necessarily in expected domains. These include how advisers engage with the social/political context of the university; understand themselves and their students; the sorts of pedagogical relationships they establish with students, and their personal subjectivities and identities. Based on the analysis, a theory of doctoral advising as an ontological process of ‘becoming a adviser’ is proposed.