Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
In rating scores, rater effects, a systematic variation associated with raters yet independent of the “true scores”, can become a major source of measurement error. Using a subsample of the ECLS-K national dataset (5910 responses, 985 children, 2880 raters), this paper builds up a multilevel cross-classified model to examine the variations in rating scores on children’s performance in reading and math. Results suggest that only 16.73% of the total variation in the observed rating scores lies between children, while 38.52% lies between raters. Parents' tend to give higher ratings than teachers do. Children's self-rating is yet higher, particularly for boys. Only teachers' rating is significantly associated with IRT subject scores.
Hui Jiang, The Ohio State University
Sui Huang, The Ohio State University
Richard G. Lomax, The Ohio State University
Ann A. O'Connell, The Ohio State University