Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This session shares teacher and student outcomes from a federally funded project that focuses on teaching eighth graders to write historical arguments. We illustrate how fidelity of implementation (adherence) and adaptation data were collected and analyzed to refine both curriculum and professional development (PD) activities in our multi-year project. We see our approach as a departure from linear and unidirectional models of PD where curriculum determines PD, and PD determines implementation. Instead, we implemented a cyclical and multi-directional model where teachers are active participants in designing, implementing and reflecting on the curriculum. We argue that curriculum developers should design PD to help teachers know how to implement critical components faithfully and how to adapt the curriculum to enhance its impact.
Susan De La Paz, University of Maryland
Mark K. Felton, San José State University
Robert G. Croninger, University of Maryland - College Park
Chauncey Monte-Sano, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor