Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
This paper, by drawing on data collected from two cases in a larger qualitative study, raises critical questions about dominant discourses that claim male English teachers are better equipped to improve boys’ literacy achievement on the basis of gender affiliation. This Ontario study created “spaces” (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000, p. 23) for secondary-school male English teachers and their male students to speak about the multiple and complex contextual and pedagogical factors (i.e., teacher knowledge, socioeconomics, streaming) influencing their literacy experiences. Their localized, nuanced stories point to the limitations of reform initiatives advocating the recruitment of male English teachers to address boys’ literacy underachievement, as the majority of the boys understood the gender of their English teachers as an insignificant factor.