Paper Summary

Academic Entitlement: Evidence for a Trait and a State

Tue, April 17, 10:35am to 12:05pm, Vancouver Convention Centre, Floor: First Level, East Ballroom B

Abstract

This study tested Academic Entitlement, evaluation appropriateness, and course rating expressed by 151 college students under three different conditions: one general academic context and two course specific contexts. Levels of entitlement beliefs and actions at the general context level were the best predictors of the same measures in course specific contexts, indicating a possible trait component. However, there were differences between levels of entitlement in general and specific course contexts, suggesting a situated component. Levels of entitlement beliefs and actions were not related to course characteristics, ratings nor to evaluation appropriateness. However, there was a high correlation between course rating and perceived evaluation appropriateness. These results suggest how an array of student perceptions might be the key to understanding entitlement.

Authors