Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Reasoning about ecosystems as scientists do involves considering the complex causal dynamics in terms of processes and steady states (e.g. Walker & Salt, 2006) as opposed to focusing on particular events. But students often bring limiting assumptions to their reasoning about ecosystems (e.g. Grotzer & Basca, 2003; Hmelo-Silver, Pfeffer, & Malhotra, 2003) and to steady states and processes in particular (e.g. Chi, 1997; 2005). This paper considers promising shifts in student reasoning about the nature of steady states and processes in ecosystems dynamics as they used a virtual environment with affordances designed to help them learn to reason about steady states and processes. It considers an intermediate level approach that students adopted and whether it may be facilitative or limiting.
Tina A. Grotzer, Harvard University
Amy M. Kamarainen, New York Hall of Science
Michael Shane Tutwiler, Harvard University
Shari J. Metcalf, Harvard University
Christopher J. Dede, Harvard University