Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Theory and research support the positive effects of constructive controversy, a cooperative learning procedure involving intellectual conflict among students, on student achievement, motivation, and interpersonal relationships. However, recent research suggests that asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) negatively affects these outcomes. The present study tests three theories by which CMC may moderate constructive controversy by randomly assigning 172 students to a 3 (synchronicity: face-to-face, synchronous, asynchronous) x 3 (belongingness: met, not met, control) experimental-control design. Results suggest that asynchronous online students had decreased motivation and cooperative perceptions and increased relational regulation compared to face-to-face or synchronous online. Belongingness-met students had increased cooperative perceptions and epistemic regulation. Findings suggest that synchronicity and belongingness have an additive effect on face-to-face and online peer learning.
Andy Saltarelli, University of Colorado - Boulder
Cary J. Roseth, Michigan State University
Chris R Glass, Old Dominion University