Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Efficient and accurate parameter estimation has remained an important issue in item response theory (IRT). Although marginal maximum likelihood (MML) estimation has been a de facto standard, recent advances in computational statistics have made Bayesian methods more accessible. But the use of priors has been inconsistent in Bayesian estimation of IRT models. The present study investigates the impact of prior choice on parameter estimation for 1-PL model and compares the accuracy of estimation for MCMC, variational Bayesian, and MML methods. The study also compares the parameter recovery for Bayesian and MML in skewed data and small samples. Results show that priors should be chosen carefully to obtain reasonable estimates and Bayesian techniques recover parameters better than MML for non-normal data.
Prathiba Natesan, University of North Texas
Ratna Nandakumar, University of Delaware
Tom Minka, Microsoft Research
Xiaoyu Qian
Jonathan D. Rubright, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants