Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The purpose of this critical discourse analysis is to explore how a Florida administrative law judge (ALJ) adjudicated the giftedness of a student. Specifically, we explore the discourse in an ALJ’s final order to uncover how an ALJ navigates through conflict and deconstructs the expert opinions and special education state statute on the definition of giftedness, and then constructs giftedness from these sources to arrive at the final decision. The findings suggest that the ALJ centered his decision based on how that ALJ constructed the expertise of professionals.