Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend research on the effects of a utility manipulation on performance. Hulleman (& Harackiewicz, 2009; Hulleman et al., 2010) found that manipulating utility only increased performance in participants with low success expectancies. The current study introduced difficult goals in conjunction with a utility manipulation in an effort to produce a synergistic effect. As predicted, a significant three-way interaction (utility, goals, success expectancies) was observed F (1,99) = 3.69, p = .058. For participants with high success expectancies, task performance was highest when they received both the utility and goal manipulations as compared to when they received only the utility manipulation (p = .005). Conclusions, limitations, and contributions are discussed further.
Jeffery John Kosovich, James Madison University
Amanda Marie Durik, Northern Illinois University
Chris S. Hulleman, University of Virginia