Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Submission Type
Browse By Descriptors
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Symposium
Currently summative assessment is dominated by the use of items emphasizing lower order cognitive skills such as recall. Assessment items are a major means by which teachers interpret the intentions of the curriculum and are also ‘high stakes’. Transforming assessment is thus an important lever to enhance the use of higher order cognitive processes of synthesis, analysis and critique. In this symposium, we present a range of innovative work exploring how to create assessment items for a range of grade levels that require the use of higher order cognitive processes within the domains of history and science. The symposium will be an opportunity to hear about the findings, the challenges and explore issues of domain-specificity versus domain-generality.
Division H - Research, Evaluation and Assessment in Schools / Section 3: Assessment in the Schools
Division L - Educational Policies and Politics / Section 3: Curriculum, Testing, and Instructional Practice
Assessing Historical Thinking: Challenges and Possibilities - Peter C. Seixas, The University of British Columbia; Kadriye Ercikan, The University of British Columbia; Lindsay S. Gibson, The University of British Columbia
Using Library of Congress’s Digital Resources to Create New Forms of History Assessments - Sam Wineburg, Stanford University; Joel Breakstone, Stanford University; Mark D. Smith, Stanford University
Including Higher-Order Thinking in Summative Assessment in Science Education - Per Kind, Durham University
Teaching and Assessing Scientific Thinking: Online Inquiry Units With Automated Scoring - Marcia Linn, University of California - Berkeley; Ou Lydia Liu, ETS; Kihyun (Kelly) Ryoo, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill; Jacqueline J. Madhok, University of California - Berkeley
Assessing Scientific Argumentation by Middle School Pupils and Testing a Learning Progression for Argumentation - Jonathan F. Osborne, Stanford University; Bryan Henderson, Stanford University; Anna MacPherson, Stanford University; Evan Szu, Stanford University