Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Help
About Vancouver
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Session Submission Type: Symposium
This session presents five papers that use advanced psychometrics to explore theoretical and applied issues in noncognitive assessment. Two prevalent practical issues in noncognitive assessment are examinee motivation and assessment methods. The first paper applies latent growth modeling to determine how examinee motivation changes throughout a low-stakes assessment setting. The second paper applies IRT analyses to forced-choice items, which serve as an alternative to traditional, often problematic means of noncognitive assessment. The remaining papers address theoretical issues, examining latent growth and group differences in the areas of ethnocultural empathy, identity development, conscientiousness, and institutional commitment. Ultimately, the key thread amongst these papers is their focus on the issue – applied or theoretical – rather than on the method itself.
Using Latent Growth Modeling to Examine Change in Motivation Across a Low-Stakes Testing Session - Carol L. Barry, The College Board; Sara J. Finney, James Madison University
Examining the Viability of Recent Models for Forced Choice Data - Jimmy de la Torre, Rutgers University; Vicente Ponsoda, Universityersidad Autonoma; Iwin Leenen, Mexican Institute for Family and Population Research; Pedro Hontangas, Universidad de Valencia
Longitudinal Invariance of the Scale of Ethnocultural Empathy - Jerusha J Gerstner, James Madison University; Dena A. Pastor, James Madison University
Change in Identity Achievement During the College Years: An HLM (Hierarchical Linear Modeling) Analysis - Kelli Samonte, James Madison University; Dena A. Pastor, James Madison University
Skills and Attitudes for College Success: A Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis With First-Generation College Students - Ross Edward Markle, Educational Testing Service; Jonas Bertling, Educational Testing Service; Priya Kannan, Educational Testing Service; Diane Cardenas Elliott, Educational Testing Service