Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of the current study is to explore the reliability of teacher effectiveness classifications from the state to consortium level. The results indicate that neither Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) nor a covariate adjusted value added model provide particularly reliable results in estimating teacher effectiveness. The validity of the model inferences is also called into question as neither model demonstrates a strong correlation with student test score change as estimated by a value table. The results are outlined and discussed in relation to each model, along with the implications for the use of model inferences in making high-stakes decisions about teacher performance.
Amanda Clauser, National Board of Medical Examiners
Lisa A. Keller, University of Massachusetts - Amherst