Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This study investigated readers’ prior beliefs about controversial topics in relation to their recall of conclusions from texts discussing those topics. Results indicated that a substantial proportion of readers recalled conclusions that matched their prior beliefs rather than what the texts actually said and also put relatively high trust in those conclusions. Those readers also displayed less cognitive reflection and critical reading strategies than readers recalling text conclusions correctly although those conlusions were at odds with what they believed about the topics. However, the latter group put less trust in the conclusions that they rightly derived from the texts, thus distancing themselves from the text-based conclusions and adjusting their trustworthiness judgments to their prior topic beliefs.
Tonje Stenseth, University of Oslo
Helge I. Stromso, University of Oslo
Ivar Braten, University of Oslo