Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential impact of misrouting under a two-stage multistage test (MST) design, which includes one routing and three second-stage modules. Simulations are used to create a situation in which a large group of examinees take each of the three possible MST paths (High, Middle, and Low). We compare differences in examinees’ scores associated with different paths under two MST assembly conditions; a small-difference condition in which three modules at Stage 2 overlap in difficulty, and a large-difference condition in which the three modules at Stage 2 are distinct in difficulty. We use two proficiency estimation methods (number-correct scoring vs. pattern-scoring) to determine which scoring method performs well despite misrouting.