Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A large literature on teacher collective bargaining describes the potential influence of provisions in teacher union contracts, but little is known about the determinants of these provisions. Using a unique dataset of every active teacher collective bargaining agreement in Washington State, we estimate each district’s “restrictiveness.” We then estimate spatial lag models to explore the relationship between the restrictiveness of a bargained contract in one district and the restrictiveness of contracts in nearby districts. Employing various measures of geographic and institutional proximity we find that “institutional bargaining structures”: Education Service Districts (ESDs), which support school districts, and Uniserv councils, which aid local teachers’ unions, play a major role in determining bargaining outcomes.
Lesley Lavery, Macalester College
Dan Goldhaber, University of Washington
Roddy Theobald, University of Washington