Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this study was to investigate what different questioning roles elementary teachers adopt to scaffold dialogical interaction, students’ cognitive responses, and the use of evidence for constructing and critiquing ideas for argumentative practices over time. The multiple -case study, designed as a follow-up study after a four-year professional development, revealed three salient changes: (a) teachers’ m-RTOP scores increased as they persistently implemented an argument-based inquiry approach, (b) in argumentative environments, teachers use multiple roles in establishing patterns of questioning, framing classroom interaction, and scaffolding students’ cognitive thinking, and (c) as teachers’ patterns of questioning changed, the frequency of students’ talk increased and the dialogical interaction between students and teachers became more evidence-based and connected.