Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The current research introduced two approaches for the incorporation of examinee characteristics into multilevel DIF analyses in large-scale assessments: multilevel Mantel-Haenszel (MMH) procedure with propensity score model and the MMH procedure with regression-based covariate control. We examined whether two proposed approaches would perform equally to detect DIF, when applied to large-scale assessments. PISA 2009 reading literacy test and survey data were used. Reading strategies and activities in which significant gender differences were found were employed as examinee characteristics. Pooled booklet method was applied to MMH procedures for the balanced incomplete booklet design that large-scale assessments often adopt. The results indicated that PSM and RBM did not perform equally in the detection of DIF. The PSM approach tended to detect more items as DIF, compared with PSM approach.