Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In order to improve achievement in mathematics, researchers and practitioners often recommend instructional strategies that capitalize on the assumed benefits of concrete representations. Recent research has indicated that instructional context and type of manipulative moderate the effectiveness of manipulatives. To better understand the environment that must be present in order for manipulatives to be effective the present study examines the relationships between two instructional characteristics: instructional guidance and type of manipulative used during learning. Results from the randomized experiment with preschoolers (N = 72) indicate that the use of manipulatives is most effective when integrated in instructional scenarios that offer high levels of support. In addition, depending on level of guidance and learning outcome, realistic manipulatives had differential effects.