Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
A quasi-experimental study was conducted to answer to the research question, what is the effect of structuring biology laboratories around argumentation on the development of science proficiencies for students from different achievement groups? Student learning was examined in the context of an instructional model emphasizing argumentation (Argument Driven Inquiry) in comparison to traditional, verification laboratories. Four biology teachers from two schools participated and student learning was assessed at the beginning and end of the school year using three instruments. Statistical analyses revealed that argumentation is effective for supporting the learning of students from all achievement levels, and indeed for some measures this instruction helps to close the achievement gaps between lower performing students and their higher performing peers.
Sherry A. Southerland, Florida State University
Anna Strimaitis, Florida State University
Patrick James Enderle, The University of Texas - Austin
Jonathon Grooms, Florida State University
Victor Dale Sampson, The University of Texas - Austin