Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The lessons of the worldwide occupy movement, and the consequent applications to a variety of injustices, are relevant and applicable to educational issues. In this portion of the panel discussion, a conceptual framework of reductionism is presented. Reductionism—reducing complex issues to simple solutions—can be used to identify and analyze reductive educational policies and practices that are driven by forces that bypass critical thinking, individual experience and judgment, and transparency in favor of derivative solutions that lack validity. Four examples from teacher education are included in the discussion—the widespread and unexamined use of the Educational Testing Service Praxis I in admission processes, institutional choices in how accreditation standards are operationalized, interpretations of state standards, and insufficient attention to political forces in teacher preparation. For each, strategies are suggested to disrupt reductionism and create change, using small and sustained actions to question policies and practices and demand valid data and transparency in the answers. The presentation also includes a call to include an important constituency—students—in identifying issues and strategies for change.