Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper draws on theory to explore the potential of two approaches to analytical ‘messiness’ (Lather 2010) that may provoke ways of thinking about researching sexuality education and which hold possibilities for more queerly knowing the unexpected. It is argued that methodological conundrums that emerge in school-based sexuality education research can push ethnographers’ working queerly to develop capacities to think the unthought more fully. Drawing on data from two ethnographic case studies, this paper uses affect theory and the notion of aporias to more fully understand and begin to re-imagine the im/possibilities of researching queerly in schools. In foregrounding analytical conundrums, ethnographers can recognise and draw on the generative potential of paradox, uncertainty and ambiguity when researching in schools.