Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Generalized eta-squared has been proposed as a variance-explained effect size that is comparable across a variety of ANOVA designs, including any number of between- and within-subjects factors. A simulation study was conducted to investigate the accuracy and precision of this effect size across designs, as well as its sensitivity to non-normal population distribution shapes. Factors investigated in the simulation included sample size, distribution shape, population eta-squared value, and ANOVA design characteristics (number and levels of between- and within-subject factors). Results indicate substantial bias in effect size estimates with small samples and greater bias in estimates associated with interaction effects than those associated with main effects. Greater bias was evident in skewed distributions, but kurtosis had little impact on the estimates.
Patricia Rodriguez de Gil, University of South Florida
Patrice S. Rasmussen, University of South Florida
Thanh Vinh Pham, University of South Florida
Jeffrey D. Kromrey, University of South Florida
Anh P Kellermann, University of South Florida
Jeanine L. Romano, American University of Sharjah
Yi-Hsin Chen, University of South Florida
Isaac Li, University of South Florida