Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Social network analysis provides the opportunity to understand leadership as a process; however, it also entails several design decisions between qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques. This paper compares the results of school leader selection in a dual language elementary school through qualitative social network analysis to potential results using three network statistics: indegree centrality, betweenness and clique analysis. It finds that centrality maintains the highest level of mixed methods legitimation and face validity given the nature of the data collected. Under some conditions, the results of qualitative network analysis and basic quantitative network analysis maintain essential similarities.