Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
While cooperative and collaborative learning studies have reported various effects that enhance group work and learning in school classrooms, recent reviews have identified problems in their classroom implementation – especially because they do not ‘problematise’ classroom peer relationships. The SPRinG (Social Pedagogic Research into Group work) approach places initial focus on development of positive peer relationships and large-scale quasi-experimental studies have shown its effectiveness. This paper explores why SPRinG was effective with regard to relational effects on classroom communication and interaction. We draw upon observations in 90 classrooms, with (observational) communication/dialogue and (self-report) relational analyses to identify that the relational approach: enhances high-order/elaborated dialogue and symmetric reciprocity within classroom communication; and effects can generalise to different types of classroom (urban/rural, single-/mixed-age).
Peter Jay Kutnick, The University of Hong Kong
Peter Blatchford, Institute of Education - London
Andrew Kenneth Tolmie, Institute of Education - London