Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this paper is to explore how curriculum tools in a literacy-focused, cross-age peer-tutoring (CAPT) program for English learners (ELs) unexpectedly hindered elaborative discussion and engagement of kindergarten and fourth grade buddy pairs in literacy activities. The key finding is that recommended scaffolds for ELs, such as simplified syntax, closed-ended comprehension checks, and visuals actually over-scaffolded literacy discussions and limited student engagement. Findings lead to implications for practitioners and researchers who strive to support elementary-level ELs in developing literacy skills. For instance, including contingent, responsive processes in curriculum materials for peer-to-peer literacy activities can help peers engage in discussions around interpreting text.
Shannon Mary Daniel, Vanderbilt University - Peabody College
Melinda E. Martin-Beltran, University of Maryland - College Park
Megan Madigan Peercy, University of Maryland - College Park
Rebecca Deffes Silverman, University of Maryland - College Park
Maria Elliker Crassas, Iowa State University