Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This review focuses on the number of response categories used and the general adherence of writing self-efficacy scales to the scale development guidelines proposed by A. Bandura (2006). The review builds on self-efficacy research examining item specificity and accuracy by examining the nature of response scales used in 48 research studies found in PsycInfo and Web of Science, including measures of writing self-efficacy. The majority of studies used the 0-100 response scale recommended by Bandura. However, this response scale was not used in the same manner throughout the literature. Number of response categories, rationale for response scale use, and use of anchor labels are discussed and synthesized relative to scale development literature.
Amanda R. Butz, University of Kentucky
Michael Toland, University of Kentucky
Sharon Zumbrunn, Virginia Commonwealth University
Fred Danner, University of Kentucky
Ellen L. Usher, University of Kentucky