Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Omitting student growth patterns over time in value-added modeling (VAM) eliminated findings that positive level 2 effects led to positive bias (better teachers look even better) while negative level 2 effects led to negative bias (worse teachers look even worse). Effective VAM requires multilevel growth mixture model rather than multilevel model.
Futoshi Yumoto, IMPAQ International
Rochelle Tractenberge, Georgetown University
Gregory R. Hancock, University of Maryland
Robert J. Mislevy, Educational Testing Service