Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Middle school algebra students (N=130) assigned to either a problem-solving control group or one of two worked examples conditions, completed a teacher-implemented classroom study to assess whether worked examples, either incorrect or correct, with self-explanation prompts lead to the attainment of procedural skills and conceptual understanding; the influence of students’ perceived competence was also explored. Worked examples and self-explanation prompts fostered conceptual understanding more than problem-solving alone. Incorrect worked examples were particularly effective and weakened the influence of perceived competence on learning. Findings suggest that learning from errors through the use of incorrect worked examples and self-explanation may serve as a buffer for students with lower perceived competence and provide a more level playing field in mathematics classrooms.