Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Using a parallel mixed-methods design, this study aimed to strengthen the knowledge base surrounding college students’ perceptions of academic cheating. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: (1) variety of definitions for cheating, (2) environmental promotion of cheating, (3) the moral transgression of cheating, (4) cheating as a historical influence, and (5) cheating as a personal decision. Quantitative findings suggest males and those who classify themselves as non-White are more likely to self-report as to past cheating behaviors. Graduate students appeared more likely than undergraduates to comment on issues regarding academic cheating. The goals of students also played a major role in the students’ perceptions. Implications for reducing and preventing academic cheating at the university level are discussed.
Tianlan Wei, Mississippi State University
Steven Randall Chesnut, University of Southern Mississippi
Lucy Barnard-Brak, Texas Tech University
Marcelo R. Schmidt, Texas Tech University