Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Scientific discourse involves flexible use of multiple representations and students need to understand and link different representations to develop a deeper understanding of science concepts. In this case study with first year university students in a physics course for non-majors, we explicitly presented students with different representations using two instruments on Thermal Physics and Optics to assess their conceptual understanding and their use of multiple representations (description using words, diagrams, formulas and coordinate graphs) to explain the concepts. We also conducted interviews to link students’ explanations to their responses in the questionnaire items. The results showed that even with explicit teaching, a large number of students were unable to apply the four representations effectively to solve physics problems.
Yen-Ruey Kuo, Curtin University
David F. Treagust, Curtin University
Miyeh Won, Curtin University
Salim Siddiqui, Curtin University
Marjan Zadnik, Curtin University