Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Non-cognitive dispositions have recently become properties of interest in both the education and psychology literature. In this paper, I draw the distinction between property-first and measurement-first approaches to understanding the meaning of theoretical terms like “grit” and “perseverance” as well as the relationship between these terms and the measurement procedures that allow us to quantify these particular properties. I argue that, depending on which approach one takes, one is confronted with different norms for the measuring procedures used, meaning that the difference in philosophical approaches may have strategic, practical import. I argue that the measurement-first approach provides the most pressing critique and is thus the one most researchers in this area ought to adopt moving forward.