Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Research and inquiry is fundamentally a problem of building knowledge from multiple information sources. Evaluating sources’ relevance and reliability is a critical element of this process, and thus an important target for instruction and assessment. This paper presents an analysis of the measurement properties of a cognitively-based assessment of research-based writing skills administered to 991 8th graders, with a focus on students’ source evaluation skills. A source evaluation task captured students’ ability to discriminate between relevant, reliable, and useful websites, and students’ proficiency with these skills predicted performance on other research-related tasks. Students’ judgments of topical relevance were considerably more accurate than their judgments of source reliability. These results are discussed with implications for cognitive theory, instruction, and assessment.
Jesse R. Sparks, Educational Testing Service
Paul Deane, Educational Testing Service
Mary E. Fowles, ETS