Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
There has been increasing demand for growth models in educational accountability in the United States. In a collaborative effort between an educational statistician and a professor preparing future principals to lead data-informed decisions, this paper begins with a constructive critique of growth models to clarify realistic expectations for educational decision-making. Drawing a distinction between universal growth models and progress models, the authors argue that progress models better match educational accountability goals, recommend adaptations of existing statistical methodologies, and introduce additional statistical methodologies to provide alternative approaches that improve progress modeling’s utility for building administrators and classroom teachers. An understanding of both progress models and growth models is necessary for leaders to engage stakeholders in continuous school improvement.
Jennifer Koran, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale
Cameron Carlson, Southern Illinois University - Carbondale