Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
To mitigate security concerns and unfair score gains, credentialing programs routinely administer new test material to examinees retesting after an initial failing attempt. Counter-intuitively, recent research suggests that repeating the identical form does not create an unfair advantage (e.g., Geving, et. al., 2005; Raymond, et al; 2009; O’Neill, 2011). The current study builds upon this research and finds that examinees repeating the identical form are not advantaged, but may in fact have lower scores and pass rates. Additionally, when presented with items incorrectly responded to on the initial attempt, examinees 65 – 71% of the time selected the same incorrect option, suggesting repeaters are misinformed rather than uninformed. Implications for providing remediation guidance and policies for accommodating repeaters are discussed.
Richard A. Feinberg, National Board of Medical Examiners
Steven Arthur Haist, National Board of Medical Examiners
Mark R. Raymond, National Board of Medical Examiners