Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Descriptor
Search Tips
Annual Meeting Theme
Exhibitors
About Philadelphia
About AERA
Personal Schedule
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The current study addressed inconsistencies in existing research regarding measures of cognitive load. Relations among several measures of cognitive load were examined while simultaneously considering metacognition. Data from ninety university students included scores from a forward digit span task, a dual-task computational span, a cognitive efficiency rating based upon difficulty task ratings and performance, schematic performance, and two metacognition inventories, the Strategic Problem Solving Inventory (Fortunato, et al., 1991) and the Jr.Mai, Version B (Sperling et al., 2002). Findings indicated significant relations among several measures of cognitive load, and yet important variance as well. Reportedmetacognition while problem solving was more strongly related to cognitive load than was reported general metacognition. Implications for research and practice are provided.
Wik Hung Pun, The Pennsylvania State University
Rayne A. Sperling, The Pennsylvania State University
Philip M. Reeves, The Pennsylvania State University